Read this page as Markdown
ZipTie.dev versus Qwairy, a detailed comparison buyers guide

AI visibility tools, head to head

ZipTie.dev vs Qwairy

Pricing, features and differences, researched August 2026.

ZipTie.dev and Qwairy both help SEO teams, agencies, and brands measure their presence in AI search results. Each tracks brand mentions and citations across tools such as Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, and Perplexity. That overlap makes them practical options for teams that want to see where AI search surfaces their brand and where competitors earn visibility. The comparison comes down to the AI platforms each tool monitors, the depth of its analysis, and the actions it supports after reporting. ZipTie.dev combines monitoring with query suggestions, competitor and source analysis, and content optimization guidance. Qwairy covers a wider set of AI tools, including Claude and Gemini, while adding sentiment analysis, technical site checks, content opportunities, and AI traffic measurement. Teams will also want to compare reporting needs, supported search engines, competitor research, content workflows, technical SEO checks, and how each platform connects AI visibility to site traffic.

At a glance

ZipTie.dev

Pick it if three engines cover the surfaces you care about, because that is all it tracks.

Entry price
$69/mo
Tracked prompts
500–2,000 checks/mo; 1 check = all 3 engines
Free trial
14 days, 75 checks

Qwairy

Pick it if you bill in euros, since the entry plan tracks 100 prompts and its assistant is read-only analysis.

Entry price
€79/mo; €65/mo annual
Tracked prompts
100 / 300 / 800; unlimited on top tier
Free trial
None - free plan instead

Hi, MooseOur AEO tool

Pick it if you want the fix shipped rather than scored: an agent that publishes the change, audio repurposing no other tool here offers at any price, and a built-in model so the AI can cost you nothing.

Entry price
$39/mo BYOK; $79/mo AI included
Tracked prompts
No hard limit on any plan
Free trial
n/a - free plan, no expiry

The row SEOs read first

Founders have SEO backgrounds?

A tool built by people who have done the work makes different choices.

ZipTie.dev

Yes

Yes.

Qwairy

Yes

Yes.

Hi, MooseOur AEO tool

Yes

Yes. Founder Sam Morris has 15+ years in SEO and software engineering.

Full comparison

202 rows across 20 categories. Values are quoted as published; where a vendor does not publish a number, the cell says so.

Feature comparison: ZipTie.dev, Qwairy and Hi, Moose. Researched August 2026.
Feature ZipTie.dev Qwairy Hi, Moose Our AEO tool
Pricing & cost model
Free plan available No - 14-day trial Yes - 120 credits, no card Yes - free forever, no card
Free daily visibility runs, no cap No No Yes - local runs unlimited on every plan
Engines free to run daily 0 0 5
Entry paid price $69/mo €79/mo; €65/mo annual $39/mo BYOK; $79/mo AI included
Annual billing discount Yes - 15% Yes - 2 months free (~17%) Yes - BYOK 2 months free; managed plans ~10%
Pricing model Monthly check allowance, 3 tiers Tiered plans + credits Flat plan with monthly AI credit balance, or BYOK
Bring your own API key No No Yes - OpenRouter
Can run with $0 AI cost to vendor No No Yes
Usage metered in one transparent unit No - separate check, summary, optimization caps Yes - credits Yes - AI credits, published rate card
In-app usage dashboard Not published Yes - balance + usage page Yes - % used, reset date, pace warning
Agency / reseller tier No - custom plans on request Yes - from €99/mo Yes - $149 BYOK Agency; $449+ AI included
Affiliate program Not published Yes - 20% for 12 months Yes
Annual contract required No No - monthly available No
Free trial length 14 days, 75 checks None - free plan instead n/a - free plan, no expiry
Paid plans pricing range $69–$159/mo + custom €79–€449/mo + custom $39–$1,999/mo
Deployment, privacy & data ownership
Native desktop app No No Yes - Windows and macOS
Browser-based app Yes Yes No
Local-first data storage No - cloud SaaS No - cloud SaaS, EU hosting Yes - local database on the device
Works offline No No Partial - local models and stored data; engine checks need the web
On-device AI Inference No No Yes
Local model sizes offered 0 0 3
Data export on cancellation CSV anytime; post-cancel terms not published Not published - CSV/API while active CSV, PDF, DOCX exports plus full local backup
SOC 2 certification No - none published Not published Pending
ISO certification No - none published Not published No
Local backup and restore No No - vendor-side only Yes - export and import a backup file
Visibility & prompt tracking
Engines tracked 3 10 10; 5 of them also collected locally
Real consumer-surface capture Yes - browser capture with screenshots Partial - 7 scraped UIs, rest via API Yes - 5 engines read from the device, no API
ChatGPT Yes Yes - UI and API Yes
Claude No Yes - API only Yes
Gemini No Yes - UI and API Yes
Google AI Mode No Yes Yes
Google AI Overviews Yes Yes Yes
Grok No Yes - UI and API Yes
Bing Copilot No Yes - UI only Yes
DeepSeek No Yes - API only Yes
Meta AI No No Yes
Tracked prompts included 500–2,000 checks/mo; 1 check = all 3 engines 100 / 300 / 800; unlimited on top tier No hard limit on any plan
Samples per prompt configurable No Yes - up to 20 per run Yes
Run cadence options Daily or weekly Daily, weekly, monthly, manual Multiple times a day, weekly, monthly, and on-demand
On-demand run now Yes - manual checks draw on allowance Yes Yes
Instant one-off check No - no free public tool Yes - free public audit tool Yes
Prompt manager Yes Yes - bulk edit, tags, funnel Yes
Branded vs non-branded classification Not published Not published - funnel stages instead Yes
Prompt categories and topics Yes - automatic tagging Yes - 5 topics max, unlimited tags Yes
Per-prompt model selection No - all 3 engines per check Partial - per-prompt cadence, models per run Yes
Brand name variant support Not published Not published Yes - secondary brand terms
Brand multi-domain support Partial - separate project per brand Partial - one domain per workspace Yes - secondary owned domains
Suggested prompts from Google Search Console Yes Yes Yes - real GSC questions
Suggested prompts from competitor gaps Partial - competitor source lists Yes Yes
Perplexity Yes Yes - UI and API Yes
Scoring & analysis
Mention detection Yes Yes Yes
Citation detection Yes Yes Yes - domain and page level
Sentiment scoring Yes - scored against query intent Yes - 0–100 plus label Yes
Average position / rank No Yes Yes
Share of Voice Partial - competitor leaderboards Yes Yes
Share of Mentions Partial - mention leaders list Yes - mention rate Yes
Share of Citations Partial - citation leaders list Yes - citation rate Yes
Narrative drift detection No - sentiment trend only Yes - monthly perception snapshots Yes - scored against a brand truth profile
Feature-parity / accuracy scoring No Yes - private beta, Growth+ Yes
Untracked brand extraction Yes - all detected brands in export Yes - auto competitor detection Yes - with sentiment and average rank
Cited source categorization Partial - social and directory sources called out Yes - type, authority, social/shopping/local Yes - 8 source types
Topic-level breakdown Yes Yes Yes
Engine-level breakdown Yes Yes Yes
Competitor tracking Yes Yes Yes - or promote any brand seen in results
Competitors included Not published Auto-detected, uncapped; 10 in compare view 15
Visibility gap analysis Yes - content and source gaps Yes Yes
ChatGPT fan-out capture Not published Yes Yes
AI Mode grounding queries capture No Not published Yes - the live grounding searches
Bing Index probe No - Google indexing only Partial - Bing Webmaster Tools connection Yes
AI crawler access check No Yes - 63 crawlers vs robots.txt Yes - retrieval, live fetch and training
Reporting & exports
Executive dashboard Yes Yes Yes
AI-written narrative summary Yes - 5–100/mo by plan Yes - weekly email and assistant Yes
Data export Yes - CSV with full answer text Yes - CSV, API, Looker Studio Yes - CSV
Branded PDF report No Partial - branding on Enterprise/Agency Custom Yes
Scheduled email reports Not published Partial - weekly only, no cadence choice Yes - paid, per-user opt-in
Action log with export No Yes - action history via API Yes - CSV on paid managed plans
Historical data retention Not published Not published - 90-day default range No cap - stored on device,. Paid plans offer 400 day backup on-cloud; audio analytics 180–365 days
Taking action (the AEO loop)
Covers full loop: track → fix → verify → deploy Partial - no deploy step Partial - no deploy step Yes
Page-level AEO audit Partial - per-query content check Yes Yes
Scored categories 5 4 9
Retrieval-readiness scoring No Yes - AEO score plus crawler access Yes - deterministic dense retrieval
Evidence tiers on recommendations No Yes - tier, score, raw signals Yes - proven, directional, best-practice
Element-level rewrite suggestions Partial - gap answers, not element edits Partial - issue list, not rewrites Yes - element, character budget, before and after
Second-model QA pass No No Yes - pass, revised or needs human review
Static crawler-view snapshot No No Yes - full-page screenshot, JavaScript off
Audit input sources Pasted text only, not a URL Sitemap pages, robots.txt, llms.txt Live URL, pasted text, file, WordPress, Webflow, Grav
Baseline vs verification re-runs Partial - trends over time, no compare view Yes - 90-day re-measure after completion Yes - compares against the baseline
Recommendation status tracking Not published Yes - accept, start, done, decline Yes - planned, staged, completed
Visibility data sets page priority Yes - per-query score Yes Yes - defend, recover, convert, earn
Search Console sets page priority Partial - GSC imports queries only Yes Yes - protect, balanced or expand
Branded audit PDF No Partial - branding on Enterprise/Agency Custom Yes
CMS integration & publishing
WordPress No Crawler log forwarding only, no publishing Yes - official plugin, production and staging
Webflow No No Yes - OAuth MCP, pages and collection items
Framer No No On roadmap
Grav No No Yes - official plugin
Shopify No No On roadmap
Surgical element-level edits to live page No No Yes
Preview before applying No No Yes
Staging environment support No No Yes - WordPress, with promote to production
One-click rollback No No Yes - WordPress
Patch history per site No No Yes - WordPress
Visual placement picker No No Yes - pick the spot on the rendered page
Push Schema JSON-LD into page No No - generates snippet to paste Yes - FAQPage schema
Publish approval gate n/a - never publishes No Yes - always, including scheduled runs
Agentic capability
Truly agentic (agent chooses its own steps) No No - read-only analysis assistant Yes - plans and executes against the live web
Fixed-workflow automation only No workflow builder either Yes - scheduled runs and detectors No - workflows exist alongside the agent
Agents can run on local model at zero cost No No Yes
Multi-agent panel No No Yes - two extra agents, paid plans
Live browser view No - browser runs server-side, unseen No Yes
Take control mid-run No No Yes
Steer agent while running No No Yes - talk to any agent mid-job
Background execution No No - scheduled monitoring only Yes - with notify on completion
Approval gate before real-world actions n/a - takes no actions No - takes no external actions Yes
Long-running deep work jobs No No Yes
Scheduled agent jobs No - scheduled checks only No Yes - daily, weekdays, weekly, monthly
Agent produces saved artifacts No Partial - saved articles and exports Yes - briefs, drafts, FAQs, audits
Evidence capture Yes - answer text and screenshots Yes - full answers and cited sources Yes - screenshots and captured proof
Searchable job history No Partial - audit, export, action history Yes
Chat & assistant
Agentic chat with mid-answer tool calls No Yes - read-only over workspace data Yes
Model picker per conversation No No Yes
LLM models available n/a Not published 27 hosted + 3 local; any model on BYOK
Chat memory across conversations No Not published Yes - semantic search over past chats
Live web search No No Yes
Fetch and read URLs Partial - reads a URL to suggest prompts No Yes
Semantic search over your own site No No Yes - on-device index
Topic coverage check Yes - content gap analysis Yes - coverage metric and gap views Yes - covered, partial or not covered
File attachments No No Yes - txt, md, doc, docx, pdf, images
In-app screenshot capture Partial - screenshots of AI answers No Yes - screen or window, with crop
Custom specialists with own tool access No No - 36 preset prompt templates Yes - plus 6 presets
Image generation No No Yes
Content generation
Research-backed briefs Partial - gap list per query Yes - 50 credits each Yes
Live SERP / PAA research Partial - Google rankings compared to AI results Partial - optional Perplexity research pass Yes - plus related searches and AI search snapshots
Full draft generation No Yes Yes
Brand voice grounding No Partial - audience personas only Yes
Brand truth profile No Yes - beta, Growth+ Yes
Internal linking placement No Not published Yes
Featured image generation No No Yes
FAQ generation with schema export No Partial - FAQ block plus schema stub Yes - HTML and JSON-LD
Key points extraction No Partial - optional summary block Yes - pushable into the live pag
AI-tell removal pass No - flags AI-written text, no rewrite No Yes - paid, toggleable
Artifact library No Partial - article list, readable via API Yes
Export formats CSV Markdown; CSV for data Markdown, HTML, DOCX, PDF, TXT
Revise artifacts in place No Yes - edit outline, regenerate sections Yes
Deploy directly to CMS No No - pull via API only Yes
Content repurposing / audio
Turn any page into audio No No Yes - URL, pasted text or file
Two-voice conversation format No No Yes
Voices 0 0 30
Languages 0 0 24
Length options n/a n/a Short, standard, deep dive
Embeddable audio player No No Yes
Player theming and layout No No Yes - theme, layout, accent, title, transcript
White-label audio attribution No No Yes - agency plans
Attribution backlink to agency No No Yes - real link in page HTML
Listening analytics No No Yes - plays, completion, listen time
BYOK audio generation No No Yes
Site crawl & monitoring
Automatic site discovery Partial - carried-over indexing module Yes - sitemap sync Yes
Scheduled full-site crawl Partial - index monitoring, not AEO Partial - manual sync, per-page audits Yes - weekly or on demand
Monitored page management No Yes - favorites, filters, re-audit Yes
Batched change digests No Partial - weekly email, not page diffs Yes
On-device semantic index No No Yes
Page freshness tracking No - index status only Partial - freshness in content score Yes
Entity & knowledge graph
Site-wide entity graph No No Yes
Inferred relationships No No Yes
Salience scoring No No Yes
Graph readable by AI agent No No Yes
Graph export No No Yes - CSV and PDF
Automation & workflows
Visibility-threshold triggers No Not published - weekly report only Yes - mentions or citations, all or one topic
Pre-built recovery recipe No Partial - prioritized plan, executed manually Yes - detect, locate, audit, stage a fix
Conditional branching No No Partial - branches on whether a matching page exists
Scheduled content cadence No No - capacity is a ranking input only Yes - daily to monthly
Workflow reports No No Yes - posted to the inbox
Alerts & inbox
Unified project inbox No Partial - action triage queue Yes
Native OS notifications No No - web only Yes - Windows and macOS
Customized notifications with severity thresholds Not published No - single on/off toggle Yes - per project
Email digest Not published Yes - weekly, fixed cadence Yes
Teams & workspaces
Seats included 1 Unlimited Unlimited on paid managed; 10 BYOK Premium, 25 BYOK Agency
Cost per additional seat Not published - no seat add-on offered 0 $0 on paid managed plans, +$7 per seat for BYOK plans
Shared allowance across team n/a - single seat Yes - credits pooled Yes
Per-member usage visibility n/a - single seat Partial - per sub-team, not per person Yes
Multi-project workspaces Yes - separate projects per brand Yes - from €199/mo Yes
Projects included Not published 1 / 5 / 20 / unlimited 1 free, 3–10 managed, 25–unlimited agency; +$10 each
Archive and restore projects Not published Yes Yes
Per-project API keys No - no API No - team-level keys Yes - rotatable
SSO / SAML No Enterprise only - OIDC Roadmap
Agency & white-label
White-label PDF reports No Enterprise / Agency Custom Yes - visibility report and audit
Custom logo, color and link No Enterprise - logo and custom domain Yes
White-label audio player No No Yes - custom attribution text and link
Client-facing backlink No No Yes
Dedicated agency tier No - custom plans on request Yes - from €99/mo Yes - four tiers
Client sub-accounts No - 1 seat, separate projects Yes - sub-teams and viewer roles No - clients are projects, no client logins
Integrations
Google Search Console Yes - imports queries Yes Yes - OAuth, credentials stay on device
Google Analytics No Yes - GA4 plus 5 others Roadmap
MCP connector support No Yes - 46 read-only tools Partial - Webflow connects over MCP
Public API No Yes - Growth and above No - project keys for own plugins only
Slack No Listed as live, not documented No
Zapier No No No
Custom connection support No - CSV export only Partial - webhooks (Enterprise), HTTP log ingest Yes - request a connection, paid plans
Platform & support
UI languages 1 (English) Not published - tracks 45+ languages 6
Troubleshooting and recovery tools No No - docs troubleshooting only Yes
In-app help agent No Yes - assistant can search docs Yes
Done-for-you service available Yes - consulting on request Partial - partner agencies, no in-house service Yes
Team
Founders have SEO backgrounds Yes. Yes. Yes. Founder Sam Morris has 15+ years in SEO and software engineering.

Which one to pick

ZipTie.dev fits teams that only need monitoring across ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, and Perplexity. Qwairy fits teams that need a browser-based platform, unlimited seats, or a public API and Looker Studio access. Both tools cover AI visibility tracking, competitor analysis, and content opportunities.

Hi, Moose fits buyers who want to move from tracking to approved site changes in the same tool. It tracks 10 engines, including ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, Bing Copilot, Meta AI, Google AI Mode, and Google AI Overviews. It also captures five consumer-facing engine results locally, supports per-prompt model selection, and has no hard prompt limit. Its AEO workflow can audit a live URL, prepare element-level edits, compare verification runs against a baseline, and publish only after approval. WordPress users can preview edits, use staging, promote changes to production, and roll back a patch.

The cost model also gives small teams more choices. Hi, Moose has a free-forever plan with no card, unlimited local visibility runs, and five engines that users can run daily at no vendor AI cost. Paid access starts at $39 per month with OpenRouter BYOK, while managed plans start at $79 per month with AI included. Hi, Moose shows AI-credit usage, reset dates, and pace warnings in the app.

The desktop setup will not suit every team. ZipTie.dev and Qwairy work in a browser, while Hi, Moose runs as a Windows or macOS app. That setup gives Hi, Moose local-first storage, local backups, three local model options, and on-device AI inference. For teams that value control over stored data and want a tool that can track, audit, prepare, verify, and deploy approved changes, Hi, Moose provides the broader workflow.

The third option

Both of these tools tell you what happened. Hi, Moose goes and fixes it.

Same visibility data, on your own machine, for $39 a month. Then it writes the change, publishes it, and re-runs the prompts to prove it worked.

No card. BYOK Free stays free.

$39 a month, or nothing at allHi, Moose is $39 a month, and the free tier runs on your own keys with no cap. ZipTie.dev is $69/mo. Qwairy is €79/mo; €65/mo annual.
Your data stays on your machine, backed up if you want itThe app runs on macOS and Windows, so prompts, answers and history sit on your disk. Paid managed plans add cloud backup, so a dead laptop does not cost you your history. Both alternatives are cloud accounts that hold your prompt set.
It fixes the page, not just the chartTrack, fix, verify, deploy. Hi, Moose audits the page, rewrites the elements, previews the change and publishes to WordPress, Webflow or Grav. Neither ZipTie.dev nor Qwairy publishes anything.
A real agent, not a saved reportThe agent picks its own steps, runs in the background, and stops at an approval gate before it touches a live page. You can watch it work and take the wheel mid-run.
Ten engines, five of them read locallyChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Grok, AI Overviews, AI Mode, Copilot, DeepSeek and Meta AI, with branded PDFs, scheduled email and history you keep forever. No per-engine add-ons.
Pages become audio, tooTurn any page into a two-voice audio version with an embeddable player you can white-label for clients. Neither competitor does audio at all.

Sources and research date

Researched August 2026

Every value comes from vendor pricing pages, public docs or a live account. Where a vendor does not publish a number, the cell says not published instead of an estimate. Plans change often. If a row is wrong, tell us and we will date the correction.

Checked for this pair

  1. 1ziptie.dev
  2. 2qwairy.co
  3. 3docs.qwairy.co