Use case Content

Create a content brief
from today's search results

Moose runs a live research pass before he writes: the current top results, People Also Ask, the AI Overview, what ChatGPT says, and the text of the pages that already rank. Then he writes the brief and lists what he read.

Watch Moose write one What is in the brief
Chat Workflows
Hi, Moosehttps://himoose.com
New chat
Home Inbox Context Visibility Workflows Audio Chats Artifact Library Connections
Recents
Create a research-backed co…Chat · now Best EV SUV for Off-Road Us…Content brief · now can you create an entity gra…Chat · 31m do we cover the topic of usi…Chat · 1h
Sam SamPremium
Create a research-backed co… New chat Share
Create a research-backed content brief
Confirm the brief target and template

Hi, Moose uses the target query and content format to shape both the brief and the first draft. Different structures need different sections, proof, and calls to action.

Primary target query
best EV SUV for off-road use
Use the main query or topic the brief should center on.
Template type
Blog post
Choose the structure Hi, Moose should follow so the brief and first draft fit the right format.
Generate brief
Create a Blog post brief for "best EV SUV for off-road use".
Fetching the current top organic results… Capturing People Also Ask and related searches… Reading the Google AI Overview and its cited sources… Crawling competitor evidence from www.caranddriver.com… Collecting Gemini grounding queries…
Search landscape
best EV SUV for off-road use
12 sources 3 competitors crawled 2 AI snapshots
Grounded in live search data, your context library, and brand voice.
Content brief
Best EV SUV for Off-Road Use: Top Picks and What to Know Before You Buy
Objective

Give EV shoppers a clear, evidence-based answer to which electric SUVs hold up off-road, tiered by real capability (heavy-duty vs. light-duty vs. budget AWD), while covering the practical trade-offs (range loss, cold-weather performance, ground clearance) that most competing roundups gloss over.

Content format
Blog post
Roundup with a comparison table
Recommended length
2,400 words
Median of the 3 pages crawled
Intent
Commercial
Classified from the live results
Information gain

None of the three ranking pages give real ground clearance and approach angles next to cold-weather range loss. Put both in one comparison table near the top and the piece answers the question the AI Overview currently answers with two different sources.

Keyword strategy
Primary best EV SUV for off-road use
Secondary electric SUV off-road capability · best off-road electric SUV · EV SUV ground clearance
Supporting EV range loss towing · electric SUV cold weather range · approach angle EV · dual motor vs locking diff
Structure
H2 The short answerQuick-answer block, 40 to 60 words. Three picks by capability tier so the AI Overview has something liftable.
H2 How we judged off-road capabilityGround clearance, approach and departure angles, diff type, drive modes. Establishes the criteria before the picks.
H2 Heavy-duty picksThe two vehicles the crawled pages agree on, with what each one gives up.
H3 Light-duty and budget AWDWhere most buyers land. Nobody ranking covers this tier properly.
H2 The trade-offs nobody puts in the tableRange loss on trails, cold-weather behaviour, charging away from corridors. This is the information gain section.
H2 Announced but not yet buyableKept separate so the piece does not imply you can order one today.
H2 FAQSix angles taken from People Also Ask questions, answered in 40 to 60 words each.
Constraints
This topic sits outside your core product category. Do not force product mentions or brand proof points into the vehicle content. Distinguish clearly between vehicles you can buy today and announced models, so nothing implies availability that does not exist. Keep claims to what the evidence supports. Do not invent performance numbers that are not in the crawled pages.
Data used
Captured 6 organic Google results for "best EV SUV for off-road use" Crawled and analyzed 3 top-ranking pages from the current search results Crawled 2 cited pages from answer-engine results Captured 8 People Also Search For suggestions Google AI Overview for "best EV SUV for off-road use" ChatGPT Search results for "best EV SUV for off-road use" Collected 2 Gemini grounding queries for "best EV SUV for off-road use" Checked 1,284 indexed pages from your site crawl on this device, last crawled 2026-10-20, for existing coverage and internal link opportunities Used 2 sections from your uploaded brand documents (Hi, Moose message house) Used the Brand Truth profile for audience, offerings, vocabulary, and claim guidance
Edit brief Save brief Export brief Generate draft from brief
Share a URL, a draft document, or run an AEO audit…
Live research enabled Claude Sonnet 5.5 Send
Hi, Moose 0.3.281 Beta Need help?
A recreation of a real run. The brief is trimmed to fit; the real one runs several pages.
Moose, a dog, supervising a desk

Chief desk supervisor. Reads the pages that rank before he suggests a word count.

The research

What Moose researched for this brief

Every brief ends with this list, printed from what was collected. For the brief above he read:

Data used
Captured 6 organic Google results for "best EV SUV for off-road use" Crawled and analyzed 3 top-ranking pages from the current search results Crawled 2 cited pages from answer-engine results Captured 8 People Also Search For suggestions Google AI Overview for "best EV SUV for off-road use" ChatGPT Search results for "best EV SUV for off-road use" Collected 2 Gemini grounding queries for "best EV SUV for off-road use" Checked 1,284 indexed pages from your site crawl on this device, last crawled 2026-10-20, for existing coverage and internal link opportunities Used 2 sections from your uploaded brand documents (Hi, Moose message house) Used the Brand Truth profile for audience, offerings, vocabulary, and claim guidance

A chat assistant on its own does not gather this. Claude does not pull Google's results, the AI Overview or ChatGPT's answer. ChatGPT does not pull the AI Overview or Gemini's grounding searches. Neither one reads your site crawl or your brand documents.

Inside the brief

What is in the brief

Written to hand to a writer.

Title, goal, audience, and why this angleThe reasoning is included so you can disagree with it
Recommended word countMedian of the competitor pages crawled
Information gainWhat this piece can say that the ranking pages do not
A quick checklist to work againstShort, for the writer
Keyword strategy in tiersPrimary, secondary, then high, medium and supporting priority
Title, meta and heading optionsSeveral of each to choose from
Section by section structureH2 and H3 framing, what each section should accomplish
Where quick-answer content belongsThe blocks an answer engine can lift cleanly
Key points to includeDrawn from the crawled pages
FAQ angles from People Also AskFrom People Also Ask
E-E-A-T considerationsWhat this topic needs you to demonstrate, specifically
Internal links in both directionsPages to link to, and pages that should link back, from your site crawl
Technical recommendationsSchema, internal links, and the on-page mechanics
Rules for this pieceIncluding what not to claim
Format aware

The format changes the brief

You pick the format up front and the structure changes with it: different sections, different proof, different calls to action. The live results also get a say, so a comparison query gets comparison framing whichever format you chose.

Blog post

Top-of-funnel or mid-funnel article structure with a quick-answer block, criteria, and an FAQ built from People Also Ask questions.

Shape · Answer first, then depth
Glossary post

Definition-first, deliberately short, written to be the thing an engine quotes when someone asks what a term means.

Shape · Definition, context, related terms
Landing page

Value proposition, proof, objection handling and CTA blocks.

Shape · Promise, proof, objections, CTA
Solutions page

Problem framing for a segment or use case, with the outcome stated before the mechanism and proof close to the claim.

Shape · Problem, outcome, mechanism, proof
Product feature page

What the feature does, who it is for, how it works, and where it sits in the workflow, with the honest limits included.

Shape · Job, mechanism, limits, next step
Your context

What he already knows about you

The brief uses the context you set up for the project and what you have said in this chat. The search results still decide what the piece covers.

From your project
The context library you set up once
Brand name and summary Audience Tone Writing style Brand values Preferred terminology Terminology to avoid Proof points
From this conversation
What you have already told it today
Your goals Confirmed facts Decisions already made Things to avoid Open questions

Questions people ask

What does the research pass change about the brief?

The recommended length is the median of the pages crawled, the FAQ angles come from People Also Ask, and the competitor section names pages that rank today. The list at the bottom says what was collected.

What if my plan does not include live research?

You get a preview brief, clearly labelled, written from your context library and brand voice with no live evidence. It is useful for structure, and it is not researched work.

How long does a full run take?

Usually a couple of minutes, most of it spent crawling the competitor pages. Revisions are near-instant because they reuse the saved research.

Does Moose crawl my own site as a competitor?

No. Your project domain is tagged as owned and excluded from the competitor crawl, so the competitor analysis is about other people. Your own pages show up separately, as internal link suggestions from your site index.

Can I change the format after the brief exists?

Yes. A glossary brief and a landing page brief are different documents, so ask for the other format and the research is reused while the structure is rebuilt.

Where does the draft come from?

One click from the brief. It inherits your brand voice, the internal link suggestions from your own site index, and a set of writing rules that strip the usual AI tells. Those rules are kept out of the visible brief so the brief stays readable.

Can this run without me?

A workflow can trigger it. When monitoring finds a topic the assistants answer without you, he can generate the brief and the first draft and leave them in your Library. Nothing publishes on its own.

More things to ask Moose

All use cases
Runs from your machine

Brief the next piece
from evidence.

Download Hi, Moose, add your target query, and read the list of what was collected at the bottom of the brief.