Read this page as Markdown
Evertune versus Gumshoe, a detailed comparison buyers guide

AI visibility tools, head to head

Evertune vs Gumshoe

Pricing, features and differences, researched August 2026.

Evertune and Gumshoe both help brands and agencies measure how AI tools describe, recommend, and cite them. Teams often compare them when they need clearer visibility in ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and other AI search surfaces. The main differences fall into AI model coverage, research methods, workflow depth, and activation options. Gumshoe centers on persona-based buyer conversation simulations across 11 AI models, then connects visibility findings with competitor, citation, content, and technical actions. Evertune tracks AI search visibility too, but it also includes content activation and advertising tools designed to reach buyers in AI conversations, cited sites, and the wider web. The right choice depends on whether your team needs detailed AI search research and optimization guidance, or a platform that also supports content and ad activation.

At a glance

Evertune

Pick it if you need very high prompt volume, because the fixed 100 samples per prompt add little once you track topics rather than individual long-tail prompts.

Entry price
$800/mo
Tracked prompts
100,000/mo; 250 custom
Free trial
None

Gumshoe

Pick it if persona-generated prompts suit how you work, keeping in mind the entry plan is 80 prompts a month and there is no trial.

Entry price
$99/mo
Tracked prompts
80/mo - 8 personas × 10 prompts
Free trial
No trial - 1 free sample audit

Hi, MooseOur AEO tool

Pick it if you want the fix shipped rather than scored: an agent that publishes the change, audio repurposing no other tool here offers at any price, and a built-in model so the AI can cost you nothing.

Entry price
$39/mo BYOK; $79/mo AI included
Tracked prompts
No hard limit on any plan
Free trial
n/a - free plan, no expiry

The row SEOs read first

Founders have SEO backgrounds?

A tool built by people who have done the work makes different choices.

Evertune

No

No. Founded in 2024 by three former Trade Desk executives, bringing a programmatic advertising background rather than a search one.

Gumshoe

No

No. Founded in 2025 by Todd Sawicki, previously CEO of ad platform Zemanta, and Patrick O'Donnell, previously a co-founder of Urbanspoon.

Hi, MooseOur AEO tool

Yes

Yes. Founder Sam Morris has 15+ years in SEO and software engineering.

Full comparison

202 rows across 20 categories. Values are quoted as published; where a vendor does not publish a number, the cell says so.

Feature comparison: Evertune, Gumshoe and Hi, Moose. Researched August 2026.
Feature Evertune Gumshoe Hi, Moose Our AEO tool
Pricing & cost model
Free plan available No - demo required No - one free sample audit Yes - free forever, no card
Free daily visibility runs, no cap No No Yes - local runs unlimited on every plan
Engines free to run daily 0 0 5
Entry paid price $800/mo $99/mo $39/mo BYOK; $79/mo AI included
Annual billing discount Not published Not published - monthly only Yes - BYOK 2 months free; managed plans ~10%
Pricing model Flat plan + prompt volume Flat monthly, billed per project Flat plan with monthly AI credit balance, or BYOK
Bring your own API key No No Yes - OpenRouter
Can run with $0 AI cost to vendor No No Yes
Usage metered in one transparent unit No - prompts and articles No - separate audit, URL and content caps Yes - AI credits, published rate card
In-app usage dashboard Not published Yes - usage tab per workspace Yes - % used, reset date, pace warning
Agency / reseller tier No Partial - partner discount, no separate plan Yes - $149 BYOK Agency; $449+ AI included
Affiliate program Not published Not published Yes
Annual contract required Not published - demo-led No No
Free trial length None No trial - 1 free sample audit n/a - free plan, no expiry
Paid plans pricing range $800/mo + custom Enterprise $99–$299/mo + custom $39–$1,999/mo
Deployment, privacy & data ownership
Native desktop app No No Yes - Windows and macOS
Browser-based app Yes Yes No
Local-first data storage No - cloud SaaS No - cloud SaaS Yes - local database on the device
Works offline No No Partial - local models and stored data; engine checks need the web
On-device AI Inference No No Yes
Local model sizes offered 0 0 3
Data export on cancellation Not published - CSV while active CSV, JSON and API anytime CSV, PDF, DOCX exports plus full local backup
SOC 2 certification Not published None published Pending
ISO certification Not published None published No
Local backup and restore No - vendor-side only No Yes - export and import a backup file
Visibility & prompt tracking
Engines tracked 9 (vendor counts 11 feeds) 11 claimed; ~8 families, 6 per audit 10; 5 of them also collected locally
Real consumer-surface capture Mixed - provider APIs + consumer apps No - official APIs, interface spot-checks Yes - 5 engines read from the device, no API
ChatGPT Yes - API and consumer app Yes Yes
Claude Yes - API only Yes Yes
Gemini Yes - API and consumer app Yes Yes
Google AI Mode Yes Not published Yes
Google AI Overviews Yes Yes Yes
Grok No Yes Yes
Bing Copilot Yes - consumer app only Unclear - listed on one page only Yes
DeepSeek Yes - API only Yes Yes
Meta AI Yes - Llama API only No Yes
Tracked prompts included 100,000/mo; 250 custom 80/mo - 8 personas × 10 prompts No hard limit on any plan
Samples per prompt configurable No - up to 100, fixed No - each prompt asked once per model Yes
Run cadence options Daily, weekly or monthly Monthly audit; weekly or daily snapshots Multiple times a day, weekly, monthly, and on-demand
On-demand run now Not published Partial - within plan audit limits Yes
Instant one-off check No No - free tools not launched Yes
Prompt manager Partial - upload custom prompts by topic Partial - generated from personas and topics Yes
Branded vs non-branded classification Yes Not published Yes
Prompt categories and topics Yes - semantic topic clusters Yes - topics per prompt Yes
Per-prompt model selection No - all models per tracker No - set per audit Yes
Brand name variant support Not published Not published Yes - secondary brand terms
Brand multi-domain support Not published Not published Yes - secondary owned domains
Suggested prompts from Google Search Console No No Yes - real GSC questions
Suggested prompts from competitor gaps Yes Partial - persona and topic gaps Yes
Perplexity Yes - consumer app only Yes Yes
Scoring & analysis
Mention detection Yes Yes Yes
Citation detection Yes Yes - URL and domain Yes - domain and page level
Sentiment scoring Yes - word and brand level Yes - $299 plan Yes
Average position / rank Yes Yes - rank per answer Yes
Share of Voice Yes Yes - visibility percentage Yes
Share of Mentions Yes Yes - leaderboard mention counts Yes
Share of Citations Yes Partial - source counts, no share metric Yes
Narrative drift detection Partial - word and sentiment trends Partial - theme and sentiment over runs Yes - scored against a brand truth profile
Feature-parity / accuracy scoring Partial - attribute-level scores No Yes
Untracked brand extraction Yes - all category brands surfaced Yes - every brand in the answers Yes - with sentiment and average rank
Cited source categorization Yes - owned, earned, affiliate, social Yes - $299 plan Yes - 8 source types
Topic-level breakdown Yes Yes Yes
Engine-level breakdown Yes Yes Yes
Competitor tracking Yes Yes Yes - or promote any brand seen in results
Competitors included 5 named; all detected brands shown Up to 30 15
Visibility gap analysis Yes Yes - persona, topic and competitor Yes
ChatGPT fan-out capture No No Yes
AI Mode grounding queries capture No No Yes - the live grounding searches
Bing Index probe No No Yes
AI crawler access check Yes - robots checks; bot logs on Enterprise Yes - per URL Yes - retrieval, live fetch and training
Reporting & exports
Executive dashboard Yes Yes Yes
AI-written narrative summary Partial - weekly recommendations Not published Yes
Data export Yes - CSV; content as MD/HTML Yes - CSV, JSON, API, share links Yes - CSV
Branded PDF report Not published No Yes
Scheduled email reports Not published Partial - run-complete emails Yes - paid, per-user opt-in
Action log with export No No Yes - CSV on paid managed plans
Historical data retention Not published Not published No cap - stored on device,. Paid plans offer 400 day backup on-cloud; audio analytics 180–365 days
Taking action (the AEO loop)
Covers full loop: track → fix → verify → deploy Partial - no publishing or verify step Partial - no deploy step Yes
Page-level AEO audit Yes - up to 1,000 pages Yes - 10–50 URLs/mo by plan Yes
Scored categories 6 published 6 named categories 9
Retrieval-readiness scoring Yes - crawler access and parseability Partial - topics grouped by retrieval issue Yes - deterministic dense retrieval
Evidence tiers on recommendations No - severity ranking only No - priority ranking only Yes - proven, directional, best-practice
Element-level rewrite suggestions Partial - page-level fixes Partial - page-level content plans Yes - element, character budget, before and after
Second-model QA pass Partial - messages pre-tested on models No Yes - pass, revised or needs human review
Static crawler-view snapshot Not published Not published Yes - full-page screenshot, JavaScript off
Audit input sources Live crawl; bot logs on Enterprise Entered URLs + site crawl Live URL, pasted text, file, WordPress, Webflow, Grav
Baseline vs verification re-runs No Yes - score history per page Yes - compares against the baseline
Recommendation status tracking Not published Not published Yes - planned, staged, completed
Visibility data sets page priority No - severity sets priority Yes - audit gaps drive recommendations Yes - defend, recover, convert, earn
Search Console sets page priority No No Yes - protect, balanced or expand
Branded audit PDF Not published No Yes
CMS integration & publishing
WordPress No No Yes - official plugin, production and staging
Webflow No No Yes - OAuth MCP, pages and collection items
Framer No No On roadmap
Grav No No Yes - official plugin
Shopify No No On roadmap
Surgical element-level edits to live page No No Yes
Preview before applying No No Yes
Staging environment support No No Yes - WordPress, with promote to production
One-click rollback No No Yes - WordPress
Patch history per site No No Yes - WordPress
Visual placement picker No No Yes - pick the spot on the rendered page
Push Schema JSON-LD into page No - audits schema only No - flags gaps only Yes - FAQPage schema
Publish approval gate No n/a - never publishes Yes - always, including scheduled runs
Agentic capability
Truly agentic (agent chooses its own steps) No - fixed workflows labelled agents No Yes - plans and executes against the live web
Fixed-workflow automation only Yes - prompts, insights, content, ads Yes - scheduled audits only No - workflows exist alongside the agent
Agents can run on local model at zero cost No No Yes
Multi-agent panel No No Yes - two extra agents, paid plans
Live browser view No No Yes
Take control mid-run No No Yes
Steer agent while running No No Yes - talk to any agent mid-job
Background execution Yes - scheduled tracker refreshes Partial - audits run server-side Yes - with notify on completion
Approval gate before real-world actions Not published n/a - no real-world actions Yes
Long-running deep work jobs Partial - report runs take hours No Yes
Scheduled agent jobs Partial - refresh schedule only No - scheduled audits, not agents Yes - daily, weekdays, weekly, monthly
Agent produces saved artifacts Yes - reports and drafts No Yes - briefs, drafts, FAQs, audits
Evidence capture Partial - scores and sources, not raw responses Partial - full audit transcripts kept Yes - screenshots and captured proof
Searchable job history Not published Partial - audit run history Yes
Chat & assistant
Agentic chat with mid-answer tool calls No No Yes
Model picker per conversation No No Yes
LLM models available 0 n/a 27 hosted + 3 local; any model on BYOK
Chat memory across conversations No No Yes - semantic search over past chats
Live web search No No Yes
Fetch and read URLs Partial - audit crawl only Partial - audits URLs you enter Yes
Semantic search over your own site No No - crawl feeds content audit only Yes - on-device index
Topic coverage check Yes Yes - $299 plan Yes - covered, partial or not covered
File attachments Partial - prompt and URL uploads No Yes - txt, md, doc, docx, pdf, images
In-app screenshot capture No No Yes - screen or window, with crop
Custom specialists with own tool access No No Yes - plus 6 presets
Image generation No No Yes
Content generation
Research-backed briefs Yes - built from visibility gaps Yes - content plans from audit gaps Yes
Live SERP / PAA research No - panel and model data No Yes - plus related searches and AI search snapshots
Full draft generation Yes - 250–3,000 words Yes Yes
Brand voice grounding Yes - guidelines + up to 10 URLs Partial - brand voice style toggle Yes
Brand truth profile Partial - brand guidelines only Not published Yes
Internal linking placement Not published Not published Yes
Featured image generation Not published No Yes
FAQ generation with schema export No Partial - FAQ format, no schema export Yes - HTML and JSON-LD
Key points extraction Yes - top 3 messages per topic No - key points are a manual input Yes - pushable into the live pag
AI-tell removal pass No No Yes - paid, toggleable
Artifact library Partial - drafts saved in editor Partial - generated pieces stored per project Yes
Export formats Markdown, HTML Not published Markdown, HTML, DOCX, PDF, TXT
Revise artifacts in place Yes - rich text editor Not published Yes
Deploy directly to CMS No - download or copy/paste No - manual publish Yes
Content repurposing / audio
Turn any page into audio No No Yes - URL, pasted text or file
Two-voice conversation format No No Yes
Voices 0 0 30
Languages 0 0 24
Length options n/a n/a Short, standard, deep dive
Embeddable audio player No No Yes
Player theming and layout No No Yes - theme, layout, accent, title, transcript
White-label audio attribution No No Yes - agency plans
Attribution backlink to agency No No Yes - real link in page HTML
Listening analytics No No Yes - plays, completion, listen time
BYOK audio generation No No Yes
Site crawl & monitoring
Automatic site discovery Yes - sitemap-based Yes - crawls the site for content gaps Yes
Scheduled full-site crawl Not published - 1,000-page cap Partial - monthly, $299 plan Yes - weekly or on demand
Monitored page management No Yes - audited page list with scores Yes
Batched change digests No No Yes
On-device semantic index No No Yes
Page freshness tracking No Partial - audit score history per page Yes
Entity & knowledge graph
Site-wide entity graph No No Yes
Inferred relationships No Partial - brand and attribute co-mentions Yes
Salience scoring No Partial - theme frequency counts Yes
Graph readable by AI agent No No Yes
Graph export No No Yes - CSV and PDF
Automation & workflows
Visibility-threshold triggers Partial - flags drops, no user thresholds No Yes - mentions or citations, all or one topic
Pre-built recovery recipe Yes - prioritized action list No Yes - detect, locate, audit, stage a fix
Conditional branching No No Partial - branches on whether a matching page exists
Scheduled content cadence Partial - 25 articles/mo on Pro No Yes - daily to monthly
Workflow reports No No Yes - posted to the inbox
Alerts & inbox
Unified project inbox No No Yes
Native OS notifications No - web only No Yes - Windows and macOS
Customized notifications with severity thresholds Not published No Yes - per project
Email digest Not published Partial - audit-complete emails Yes
Teams & workspaces
Seats included Unlimited Unlimited - no per-seat fee Unlimited on paid managed; 10 BYOK Premium, 25 BYOK Agency
Cost per additional seat 0 $0 $0 on paid managed plans, +$7 per seat for BYOK plans
Shared allowance across team Yes Yes - allowance sits on the project Yes
Per-member usage visibility Not published Partial - usage tab, not per member Yes
Multi-project workspaces Yes - one tracker per category/market Yes Yes
Projects included Unlimited brands; tracker cap not published Unlimited; each billed its own plan 1 free, 3–10 managed, 25–unlimited agency; +$10 each
Archive and restore projects Not published Not published Yes
Per-project API keys No Not published Yes - rotatable
SSO / SAML Enterprise only Not published Roadmap
Agency & white-label
White-label PDF reports No No - stated as roadmap Yes - visibility report and audit
Custom logo, color and link No No Yes
White-label audio player No No Yes - custom attribution text and link
Client-facing backlink No No Yes
Dedicated agency tier No No - partner discount on same plans Yes - four tiers
Client sub-accounts Not published Yes - client workspaces, viewer role No - clients are projects, no client logins
Integrations
Google Search Console No No Yes - OAuth, credentials stay on device
Google Analytics No No Roadmap
MCP connector support No Not published Partial - Webflow connects over MCP
Public API Not published Yes - read-only No - project keys for own plugins only
Slack No No No
Zapier No No No
Custom connection support Partial - affiliate and ad-platform partners API and exports only Yes - request a connection, paid plans
Platform & support
UI languages 1 (English); tracks many countries/languages 1 (English) 6
Troubleshooting and recovery tools No Not published Yes
In-app help agent No - help center only Yes - AI chat with human handoff Yes
Done-for-you service available Yes - onboarding; success manager on Enterprise No - agency partner network Yes
Team
Founders have SEO backgrounds No. Founded in 2024 by three former Trade Desk executives, bringing a programmatic advertising background rather than a search one. No. Founded in 2025 by Todd Sawicki, previously CEO of ad platform Zemanta, and Patrick O'Donnell, previously a co-founder of Urbanspoon. Yes. Founder Sam Morris has 15+ years in SEO and software engineering.

Which one to pick

Evertune and Gumshoe both cover core AI search visibility work. Evertune may suit larger brands that need its high prompt volume, unlimited seats, and advertising-focused tools. Gumshoe may suit teams that prefer a browser-based platform, need client workspaces, or want JSON exports and a read-only API.

Hi, Moose fits small businesses and agencies that want to move from visibility data to approved page changes in one tool. It tracks 10 engines, including ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, Bing Copilot, Google AI Mode, and AI Overviews. It also captures AI Mode grounding queries and ChatGPT fan-out data, then uses that evidence in page-level audits.

The price difference matters for smaller teams. Hi, Moose offers a free-forever plan with no card, five engines that users can run daily, and unlimited local visibility runs. Paid plans start at $39 per month with OpenRouter BYOK or $79 per month with AI included, compared with $99 per month for Gumshoe and $800 per month for Evertune. Hi, Moose also publishes AI credit rates, shows usage pace and reset dates in the app, and lets BYOK users run AI work without AI costs to Hi, Moose.

Hi, Moose gives teams more control over where their data and AI work run. Its Windows and macOS app stores data in a local database, supports local backups, and offers three local model sizes for on-device inference. That setup will not suit teams that require a browser-based app. For teams that value local storage, full local backups, and the option to run models on their own device, it provides a clear alternative to cloud-only tools.

Tracking only helps when teams can act on the findings. Hi, Moose supports the full track, fix, verify, and deploy loop. It can prioritize pages with visibility and Search Console data, create element-level edits with before-and-after guidance, run a second-model QA pass, compare verification runs to a baseline, and track each recommendation through planned, staged, and completed states. Its WordPress, Webflow, and Grav connections let users preview approved edits before publishing. WordPress users can also work in staging, promote changes to production, roll back a patch, and review patch history.

Agencies can also use Hi, Moose for branded PDF visibility and audit reports, custom logo and color settings, and white-label audio players. Gumshoe offers client workspaces and viewer roles, while Hi, Moose currently treats clients as projects rather than giving them separate logins. That makes Gumshoe the stronger choice when direct client access is a firm requirement.

For buyers who need AI search tracking alone, all three tools cover the basics. Hi, Moose makes the stronger case when a team needs broad engine coverage, transparent lower-cost options, local-first control, evidence capture, content and technical audits, and an approval-based path to deploy fixes.

The third option

Both of these tools tell you what happened. Hi, Moose goes and fixes it.

Same visibility data, on your own machine, for $39 a month. Then it writes the change, publishes it, and re-runs the prompts to prove it worked.

No card. BYOK Free stays free.

$39 a month, or nothing at allHi, Moose is $39 a month, and the free tier runs on your own keys with no cap. Evertune is $800/mo. Gumshoe is $99/mo.
Your data stays on your machine, backed up if you want itThe app runs on macOS and Windows, so prompts, answers and history sit on your disk. Paid managed plans add cloud backup, so a dead laptop does not cost you your history. Both alternatives are cloud accounts that hold your prompt set.
It fixes the page, not just the chartTrack, fix, verify, deploy. Hi, Moose audits the page, rewrites the elements, previews the change and publishes to WordPress, Webflow or Grav. Neither Evertune nor Gumshoe publishes anything.
A real agent, not a saved reportThe agent picks its own steps, runs in the background, and stops at an approval gate before it touches a live page. You can watch it work and take the wheel mid-run.
Ten engines, five of them read locallyChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Grok, AI Overviews, AI Mode, Copilot, DeepSeek and Meta AI, with branded PDFs, scheduled email and history you keep forever. No per-engine add-ons.
Pages become audio, tooTurn any page into a two-voice audio version with an embeddable player you can white-label for clients. Neither competitor does audio at all.

Sources and research date

Researched August 2026

Every value comes from vendor pricing pages, public docs or a live account. Where a vendor does not publish a number, the cell says not published instead of an estimate. Plans change often. If a row is wrong, tell us and we will date the correction.

Checked for this pair

  1. 1evertune.ai
  2. 2docs.evertune.ai
  3. 3gumshoe.ai
  4. 4support.gumshoe.ai